Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints

From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Date: 2021-06-17 13:04:04
Message-ID: CAFiTN-tRuJHy+L2LjgD0QRkHOhG2KR6AsRVp6wzDptC3QFmw=Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 2:50 PM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
>
> On 17/06/2021 08:45, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> > Another problem with directly scanning the directory is, how we
> > are supposed to get the "relpersistence" which is stored in pg_class
> > tuple right?
>
> You only need relpersistence if you want to use the buffer cache, right?
> I think that's a good argument for not using it.

Yeah, that is the one place, another place I am using it to decide
whether to WAL log the new page while writing into the target
relfilenode, if it is unlogged relation then I am not WAL logging. But
now, I think that is not the right idea, during creating the database
we should WAL log all the pages irrespective of whether the table is
logged or unlogged.

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Dilger 2021-06-17 13:19:58 Re: Fix for segfault in logical replication on master
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2021-06-17 12:57:41 Re: Issue with some calls to GetMultiXactIdMembers()