Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Date: 2021-06-17 09:20:39
Message-ID: 9dba95df-982e-da50-c8f3-7601fbfbda29@iki.fi
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 17/06/2021 08:45, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> Another problem with directly scanning the directory is, how we
> are supposed to get the "relpersistence" which is stored in pg_class
> tuple right?

You only need relpersistence if you want to use the buffer cache, right?
I think that's a good argument for not using it.

- Heikki

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2021-06-17 09:25:08 Re: Decoding speculative insert with toast leaks memory
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2021-06-17 09:20:21 Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side