| From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Questions/Observations related to Gist vacuum |
| Date: | 2019-10-21 06:00:14 |
| Message-ID: | CAFiTN-tP68Vf9+TS0ufxXs3gCoN9uOtGmFf-TNDzFjAsfuGiRg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 11:23 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 10:48 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the test. It shows that prior to patch the memory was
> > getting leaked in TopTransactionContext during multi-pass vacuum and
> > after patch, there is no leak. I will commit the patch early next
> > week unless Heikki or someone wants some more tests.
> >
>
> Pushed.
Thanks.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2019-10-21 06:07:01 | Re: jsonb_set() strictness considered harmful to data |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2019-10-21 05:53:02 | Re: Questions/Observations related to Gist vacuum |