Re: Questions/Observations related to Gist vacuum

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Questions/Observations related to Gist vacuum
Date: 2019-10-21 05:53:02
Message-ID: CAA4eK1KNDHwMWK9VOwAVqE6M+gxdBOSHx0o8yJb7jfMCMezRLg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 10:48 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the test. It shows that prior to patch the memory was
> getting leaked in TopTransactionContext during multi-pass vacuum and
> after patch, there is no leak. I will commit the patch early next
> week unless Heikki or someone wants some more tests.
>

Pushed.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2019-10-21 06:00:14 Re: Questions/Observations related to Gist vacuum
Previous Message Bryn Llewellyn 2019-10-21 05:43:12 Cannot commit or rollback in “security definer” PL/pgSQL proc