Re: pg_checksums?

From: Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_checksums?
Date: 2023-10-30 13:56:51
Message-ID: CAFh8B=kUT1-dNwfh4rQnAoMpseVLEDtEq+icP9Fdhb5OZocBzQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 at 14:46, Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Erroneously thinking that Percona develops Patroni. :D
>

IIRC, they may have made one or two contributions, but very minor.
But anyway, Patroni is orthogonal to pg_checksums.

As Michael already said, the following workflow works just fine (I did it
dozens of times):
1. enable checksums on the standby node
2. start the standby and let it catch up with the primary
3. switchover to a standby node
4. enable checksums on the former primary (now replica).

Regards,
--
Alexander Kukushkin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Ventimiglia 2023-10-30 15:05:20 Help with a good mental model for estimating PostgreSQL throughput
Previous Message Ron 2023-10-30 13:46:21 Re: pg_checksums?