Re: pg_rewind WAL segments deletion pitfall

From: Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: torikoshia <torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, bungina(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_rewind WAL segments deletion pitfall
Date: 2023-10-30 15:26:39
Message-ID: CAFh8B=k80mdYeEZf6OMpQSMXa7rj5trwoGBVZv+7Lha900HpvQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 at 08:50, torikoshia <torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:

>
> I have very minor questions on the regression tests mainly regarding the
> consistency with other tests for pg_rewind:
>

Please find attached a new version of the patch. It addresses all your
comments.

Regards,
--
Alexander Kukushkin

Attachment Content-Type Size
v7-0001-pg_rewind-wal-deletion.patch text/x-patch 7.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-10-30 15:32:26 Re: BUG #15172: Postgresql ts_headline with <-> operator does not highlight text properly
Previous Message PG Bug reporting form 2023-10-30 13:24:53 BUG #18173: ERROR: could not identify a comparison function for type unknown

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2023-10-30 16:01:22 Re: trying again to get incremental backup
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2023-10-30 15:20:06 Re: Memory consumed by child SpecialJoinInfo in partitionwise join planning