From: | torikoshia <torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, bungina(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_rewind WAL segments deletion pitfall |
Date: | 2023-10-18 06:50:39 |
Message-ID: | 763cac924055f1669578bea950c667c7@oss.nttdata.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Thanks for the patch.
I tested the v6 patch using the test script attached on [1], old primary
has succeeded to become new standby.
I have very minor questions on the regression tests mainly regarding the
consistency with other tests for pg_rewind:
> +setup_cluster;
> +create_standby;
Would it be better to add parentheses?
Also should we add "RewindTest::" for these function?
> +primary_psql("create table t(a int)");
> +primary_psql("insert into t values(0)");
> +primary_psql("select pg_switch_wal()");
..
Should 'select', 'create', etc be capitalized?
> my $false = "$^X -e 'exit(1)'";
I feel it's hard to understand what does this mean.
Isn't it better to add comments and describe this is for windows
environments?
--
Regards,
--
Atsushi Torikoshi
NTT DATA Group Corporation
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Guo | 2023-10-18 06:57:37 | Re: Assert failure when CREATE TEMP TABLE |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-10-18 01:22:14 | Re: BUG #18155: Logical Apply Worker Timeout During TableSync Causes Either Stuckness or Data Loss |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2023-10-18 07:07:38 | Re: Rename backup_label to recovery_control |
Previous Message | Richard Guo | 2023-10-18 06:39:41 | Re: Oversight in reparameterize_path_by_child leading to executor crash |