From: | Denish Patel <denish(at)omniti(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Craig James <cjames(at)emolecules(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jeff Frost <jeff(at)pgexperts(dot)com>, Payal Singh <payal(at)omniti(dot)com>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Cold backup with rsync -- WAL files? |
Date: | 2013-12-06 21:19:05 |
Message-ID: | CAFddxvNy2EQyH3r5kAwabwkghr+sg7oqi+AwRaH93AydDJMeNQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Payal is right. You don't need WAL for Cold backup.
my 2 cents.
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Craig James <cjames(at)emolecules(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Jeff Frost <jeff(at)pgexperts(dot)com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > On Dec 6, 2013, at 11:07, Craig James <cjames(at)emolecules(dot)com> wrote:
>> >
>> > After I rsync the postgres data directory, do I need the WAL files from
>> the source (they're on a separate disk, not part of the postgres data
>> directory)? Can/should I erase the WAL directory of the destination?
>>
>> Yes, you need the WAL files.
>>
>
> Now I have two directly conflicting answers. You say the WAL files are
> needed even though the DB is shut off, and Payal Singh says I don't need
> the WAL files (but I don't think he cc'd the mailing list).
>
> Why are the WAL files necessary if the DB is shut off? Why can't they
> just be erased?
>
> It's a gigabyte of copying that I was hoping to avoid.
>
> Craig
>
>
--
Denish Patel,
OmniTi Computer Consulting Inc.
Database Architect,
http://omniti.com/does/data-management
http://www.pateldenish.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Frost | 2013-12-06 21:32:12 | Re: Cold backup with rsync -- WAL files? |
Previous Message | Craig James | 2013-12-06 21:11:21 | Re: Cold backup with rsync -- WAL files? |