Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses

On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> >> Yes unless many people object the commit.
> >>
> >> Michael,
> >> You're now modifying the patch?
> > Not within a couple of days.
>
> I think it's really too late for this for 9.4. At this point it's
> less than 48 hours until beta1 wraps, and we do not have the bandwidth
> to do anything but worry about stabilizing the features we've already
> got.
>

But it's a very small change with many benefits, and Michael acted very
proactive to make this happens.

In a few hours I'll fix the last two suggestions (Fujii and Andres) and
send it again.

Regards,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
>> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello