| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fabrízio Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses |
| Date: | 2014-05-09 23:42:39 |
| Message-ID: | 10449.1399678959@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Yes unless many people object the commit.
>>
>> Michael,
>> You're now modifying the patch?
> Not within a couple of days.
I think it's really too late for this for 9.4. At this point it's
less than 48 hours until beta1 wraps, and we do not have the bandwidth
to do anything but worry about stabilizing the features we've already
got.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabrízio de Royes Mello | 2014-05-09 23:57:58 | Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2014-05-09 23:37:43 | Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses |