Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch]: RM 1730 - Role membership control display needs improvement

From: Khushboo Vashi <khushboo(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch]: RM 1730 - Role membership control display needs improvement
Date: 2017-01-13 04:55:27
Message-ID: CAFOhELdKrsHky9OgCUcAEgBK1q2Tf1M2=0zPRWMu=tFnF2rATA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Hi,

The updated patch attached.

Thanks,
Khushboo

On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:

> Hi
>
> On Friday, January 6, 2017, Khushboo Vashi <khushboo(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)
> com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please find the attached patch to fix RM 1730 - Role membership control
>> display needs improvement
>>
>> *Fixed items:*
>>
>> - An alternate note is needed when shown on the properties panel
>> - Remove the border
>> - Align the label and control in columns as per other controls.
>>
>> *Remaining*:
>>
>> - Investigate making the control multi-line.
>> - The control already implemented in a way that, once the selected
>> options don't fit in a single line, it becomes multi-line.
>>
>
> That should be fine then I think.
>
> The rest looks good, except:
>
> - If there are no roles listed, it still has a hint of "Select members" in
> the properties panel.
>
> Done

> - If there are roles listed, there's a non-functional but clickable x at
> the end of the control.
>
> Done

> Can you look at those issues please?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
RM_1730_ver1.patch text/x-patch 5.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2017-01-13 05:48:42 Re: Driver Module
Previous Message George Gelashvili 2017-01-12 22:41:14 Re: Acceptance Tests against a browser (WIP)