Re: Improve the granularity of PQsocketPoll's timeout parameter?

From: Dominique Devienne <ddevienne(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Tristan Partin <tristan(at)partin(dot)io>
Subject: Re: Improve the granularity of PQsocketPoll's timeout parameter?
Date: 2024-06-14 07:16:25
Message-ID: CAFCRh-9rvDeqbRVp=CpLupVbd0MT-=xoq=DpPDo=J06HKN8bDw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 9:18 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > +1 for push.
>
> Done. [...]

Thanks a lot Tom (and reviewers)! --DD

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Winter Loo 2024-06-14 07:38:16 may be a buffer overflow problem
Previous Message Andrey M. Borodin 2024-06-14 07:06:36 Re: Allow non-superuser to cancel superuser tasks.