Re: Improve the granularity of PQsocketPoll's timeout parameter?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Tristan Partin <tristan(at)partin(dot)io>, Dominique Devienne <ddevienne(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Improve the granularity of PQsocketPoll's timeout parameter?
Date: 2024-06-13 19:18:48
Message-ID: 2072100.1718306328@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> +1 for push.

Done. I noticed in final review that libpq-fe.h's "#include <time.h>",
which I'd feared to remove because I thought we'd shipped that
already, actually was new in f5e4dedfa. So there shouldn't be
anything depending on it, and I thought it best to take it out again.
Widely-used headers shouldn't have unnecessary inclusions.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2024-06-13 19:20:29 Re: RFC: adding pytest as a supported test framework
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2024-06-13 19:16:54 Re: RFC: adding pytest as a supported test framework