Re: build remaining Flex files standalone

From: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: build remaining Flex files standalone
Date: 2022-09-03 03:03:57
Message-ID: CAFBsxsHUrkEV_9aGCtJE0DGdACUYf2X7gBVhjpOxjg_XZoQ-XA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Sep 3, 2022 at 1:29 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
> Are you planning to press ahead with these?

I was waiting for feedback on the latest set, so tomorrow I'll see
about the FIXME and remove the leftover bogus include. I was thinking
of applying the guc-file patches separately and then squashing the
rest since they're *mostly* mechanical:

> > Subject: [PATCH v4 01/11] Preparatory refactoring for compiling guc-file.c
> > standalone
> > Subject: [PATCH v4 02/11] Move private declarations shared between guc.c and
> > guc-file.l to new header
> > Subject: [PATCH v4 03/11] Build guc-file.c standalone
>
> 01-03 are a bit more complicated, but still look not far off. There's a FIXME
> about failing headercheck.

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2022-09-03 04:30:58 Re: postgres_fdw hint messages
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-09-03 02:06:54 Re: postgres_fdw hint messages