From: | Pól Ua Laoínecháin <linehanp(at)tcd(dot)ie> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Size on disk of INT and BIGINT - not sure I'm getting it? |
Date: | 2021-05-28 09:35:44 |
Message-ID: | CAF4RT5QJA0kP-e1s5Of6HCx9GOXeE0=3WqnrBg8L-hmfF1dixw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi all,
I did the following (Asus laptop, Intel core i5, SATA SSD):
BIGINTEGER and INTEGER tables the same size? Comparing tables of 100M records.
Create tables:
=================================================
test=# CREATE TABLE big_int (x BIGINT NOT NULL);
CREATE TABLE
test=# CREATE TABLE int_32 (y INT);
CREATE TABLE
================================================
Do my inserts:
=================================================
test=# INSERT INTO big_int SELECT 1 FROM GENERATE_SERIES(1, 100000000);
INSERT 0 100000000
test=# INSERT INTO int_32 SELECT 1 FROM GENERATE_SERIES(1, 100000000);
INSERT 0 100000000
Time: 115153.540 ms (01:55.154)
=================================================
Checks on my table/record sizes:
tables:
====================================================
test=# SELECT pg_size_pretty( pg_total_relation_size('big_int'));
pg_size_pretty
----------------
3458 MB
(1 row)
Time: 0.494 ms
test=# SELECT pg_size_pretty( pg_total_relation_size('int_32'));
pg_size_pretty
----------------
3458 MB
(1 row)
Time: 0.828 ms
Ooops! *_Exactly_* the same size!
======================================================
Double checked and tried to be more precise:
=====================================================
Time: 0.639 ms
test=# SELECT pg_total_relation_size('big_int');
pg_total_relation_size
------------------------
3625803776
(1 row)
Time: 0.355 ms
test=# SELECT pg_total_relation_size('int_32');
pg_total_relation_size
------------------------
3625803776
(1 row)
Same size to the byte!!
=================================================
Final check to see what's going on?
=================================================
test=# SELECT SUM(pg_column_size(x))/100000000 FROM big_int;
?column?
----------
8
(1 row)
Time: 3873.954 ms (00:03.874)
test=# SELECT SUM(pg_column_size(y))/100000000 FROM int_32;
?column?
----------
4
(1 row)
Time: 3913.429 ms (00:03.913)
test=#
===================================================
I'm trying to make sure that my table takes up 8 bytes for each entry
in the bit_int table and 4 bytes for every entry in int_32.
I'd be grateful for
a) an explanation as to what's going on?
and
b) what do I have to do to ensure that records will take up the space
that I want them to?
This latter part would possibly be covered by a good answer to a).
Any decent references, URLs... &c. much appreciated - although not to
source code please - a bit above my pay grade! :-)
TIA and rgs,
Pól...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Francisco Olarte | 2021-05-28 09:51:07 | Re: Size on disk of INT and BIGINT - not sure I'm getting it? |
Previous Message | Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) | 2021-05-28 03:42:22 | Re: How long to get a password reset ??? |