| From: | Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | recent Gartner's publication |
| Date: | 2015-10-14 18:38:45 |
| Message-ID: | CAF4Au4yTqw=hC80qaAcwNmZdGqTXEWx0odUSJytWsQFoNoScsQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
I don't like this about EDB:
*Community leadership: *EnterpriseDB is the primary contributor to the
Postgres community, and responsible for recent features such as JSON
support ....
Am I right and "recent features such as JSON support" means our (me, Teodor
Sigaev <https://www.facebook.com/teodor.sigaev>, Andrew Dunstan
<https://www.facebook.com/andrew.m.dunstan>, Alexander Korotkov
<https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000478132817>, Peter Geoghegan)
work on jsonb ? If so, should we ask Gartner to correct this ?
http://www.gartner.com/technology/reprints.do?id=1-2PMFPEN&ct=151013&st=sb
Regards,
Oleg
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bob Lunney | 2015-10-14 19:01:44 | Re: recent Gartner's publication |
| Previous Message | Darren Duncan | 2015-09-28 20:43:21 | Re: Parallel VACUUM in feature matrix on website |