Re: recent Gartner's publication

From: Bob Lunney <bobl(at)aweber(dot)com>
To: obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: recent Gartner's publication
Date: 2015-10-14 19:01:44
Message-ID: 8380442160137218385@unknownmsgid
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

It looks like Gartner took the easy way out and excluded open source
databases entirely. Unless the is a company backing the "product", i.e.
someone to fill out their RFI, they couldn't be bothered to do full
research on the state of popular DBMS's.

I absolutely think the record should be set straight on who and how
features are developed for PostgreSQL. Laziness is not an excuse for
incorrect attribution.

Regards,

Bob Lunney

Sent from my PDP11

On Oct 14, 2015, at 2:39 PM, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

I don't like this about EDB:

*Community leadership: *EnterpriseDB is the primary contributor to the
Postgres community, and responsible for recent features such as JSON
support ....

Am I right and "recent features such as JSON support" means our (me, Teodor
Sigaev <https://www.facebook.com/teodor.sigaev>, Andrew Dunstan
<https://www.facebook.com/andrew.m.dunstan>, Alexander Korotkov
<https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000478132817>, Peter Geoghegan)
work on jsonb ? If so, should we ask Gartner to correct this ?

http://www.gartner.com/technology/reprints.do?id=1-2PMFPEN&ct=151013&st=sb

Regards,
Oleg

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2015-10-14 21:44:22 Re: recent Gartner's publication
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2015-10-14 18:38:45 recent Gartner's publication