| From: | Alban Hertroys <haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
| Cc: | depesz(at)depesz(dot)com, PostgreSQL - General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ? |
| Date: | 2011-10-31 13:52:28 |
| Message-ID: | CAF-3MvN3qbXncVozMs++DcMni+J2S_8wfu6J4u-iC-z=ZrNk1Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-www |
2011/10/30 Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>:
>
> I have no intention to build the -id packages again, given the lack of
> request (first request since 8.3.11...). You can build your own packages
> quite easily, though.
But... aren't integer datetimes supposed to be the default, with float
datetimes quickly becoming deprecated?
Or does the current package (w/o the -id suffix) already implement that default?
I don't run PG on Linux, but I imagine those who do might be
interested in the answer ;)
--
If you can't see the forest for the trees,
Cut the trees and you'll see there is no forest.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2011-10-31 14:06:14 | Re: Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ? |
| Previous Message | Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz | 2011-10-31 13:31:41 | [PL/pgSQL] function call |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2011-10-31 14:06:14 | Re: Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ? |
| Previous Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2011-10-31 12:36:40 | Re: Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ? |