| From: | hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alban Hertroys <haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, PostgreSQL - General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ? |
| Date: | 2011-10-31 14:06:14 |
| Message-ID: | 20111031140614.GA4408@depesz.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-www |
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 02:52:28PM +0100, Alban Hertroys wrote:
> 2011/10/30 Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>:
> >
> > I have no intention to build the -id packages again, given the lack of
> > request (first request since 8.3.11...). You can build your own packages
> > quite easily, though.
>
> But... aren't integer datetimes supposed to be the default, with float
> datetimes quickly becoming deprecated?
> Or does the current package (w/o the -id suffix) already implement that default?
> I don't run PG on Linux, but I imagine those who do might be
> interested in the answer ;)
id is default in 8.4, and I am/was looking for 8.3.
Best regards,
depesz
--
The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it.
http://depesz.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2011-10-31 14:41:40 | Re: [PL/pgSQL] function call |
| Previous Message | Alban Hertroys | 2011-10-31 13:52:28 | Re: Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Kupershmidt | 2011-10-31 19:12:41 | subscribe for psycopg list hangs |
| Previous Message | Alban Hertroys | 2011-10-31 13:52:28 | Re: Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ? |