From: | dbatoCloud Solution <dbatocloud17(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Partition table Creation and Testing using Inherited method |
Date: | 2021-03-03 11:36:52 |
Message-ID: | CAEz7P_sfmSRJhDtfzBUwNvqkdUyzHWyi4K1HYLjdpQL4vt6FVw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
I dropped the table and recreated the partition table by using the Range by
the condition. Regarding performance improvement, I am working on it like
creating a separate index for sub-partition also parallel process if it is
possible
Thanks & Best Wishes,
Ashok
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ashokkumar Mani *(OCP12c/11g/10g/9i, AWS SAA, M103)*
*Dubai** , UAE* *| BLR , INDIA*
M: *+971 54 723 0075 *| *+91 90086 70302 | *WApp :* +91 81975 99922*
W: https://dbatocloudsolution.blogspot.in/
<http://dbatocloudsolution.blogspot.in/> | E: dbatocloud17(at)gmail(dot)com
On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 4:34 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 14:31 +0530, dbatoCloud Solution wrote:
> > Thanks! I understood the problem, But, at this moment it is not possible
> to
> > upgrade the DB version (10.13) to 11 or 12 due to a sprint issue.
>
> PostgreSQL v10 already has (limited) partitioning support, but I'd
> rather use that than inheritance partitioning.
>
> > Is there any other way to improve the performance?
>
> Partitioning typically doesn't improve query performance...
>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
> --
> Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | stephanhahn | 2021-03-03 14:36:07 | Re: make postgres readonly |
Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2021-03-03 11:04:54 | Re: Partition table Creation and Testing using Inherited method |