Re: standby server is complaining about missing wal file after switchover

From: Dhirendra Singh <dhirendraks(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jerry Sievers <gsievers19(at)comcast(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: standby server is complaining about missing wal file after switchover
Date: 2022-10-15 02:43:02
Message-ID: CAEyh4sZexbe66sg+XJsU0-UXMgtG+-nMnPymMFf83mFYAEZNeg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Thanks. This worked.

On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 5:12 AM Jerry Sievers <gsievers19(at)comcast(dot)net>
wrote:

> Dhirendra Singh <dhirendraks(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> > My postgres version is 14.2
> > I have setup streaming replication between a primary and a standby using
> replication slot and without
> > archive.
> > I have created replication slot "slot1" on the primary.
> > I did switchover following below steps.
> > 1. shutdown the primary server.
> > 2. created replicated slot "slot1" on standby and promoted it to primary.
> > 3. run pg_rewind on the old primary and made it standby.
> > 4. started the old primary as new standby.
> >
> > I got following error in the new standby. it is complaining about
> missing wal file on the new primary.
> >
> > 2022-10-13 12:58:48.497 UTC [25] LOG: fetching timeline history file
> for timeline 2 from primary
> > server
> > 2022-10-13 12:58:48.508 UTC [25] LOG: started streaming WAL from
> primary at 0/B000000 on
> > timeline 1
> > 2022-10-13 12:58:48.508 UTC [25] FATAL: could not receive data from WAL
> stream: ERROR:
> > requested WAL segment 00000002000000000000000B has already been removed
> > 2022-10-13 12:58:48.509 UTC [21] LOG: new target timeline is 2
> > 2022-10-13 12:58:48.580 UTC [28] LOG: started streaming WAL from
> primary at 0/B000000 on
> > timeline 2
> > 2022-10-13 12:58:48.580 UTC [28] FATAL: could not receive data from WAL
> stream: ERROR:
> > requested WAL segment 00000002000000000000000B has already been removed
> >
> > why the new primary has removed the wal file even though i created
> replication slot on it before
> > promoting.
> > value of max_slot_wal_keep_size is -1 and wal_keep_size is 0
>
> Dunno but did you call the pg_create_physical_replication_slot()
> function with arg2=true to have it immediately keep the WAL pointer?
>
> I believe otherwise not until the slot has been connected to does it
> retain anything.
>
> HTH
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dhirendra.
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Holger Jakobs 2022-10-15 18:18:55 Re: Open source HA setup for postgres
Previous Message Licio Matos 2022-10-15 01:26:15 Re: Best open source monitoring tools for PostgreSQL?