From: | Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Standardize type of variable when extending Buffers |
Date: | 2023-07-10 11:08:36 |
Message-ID: | CAEudQAqJMrnmGPMsBVnLkKOJHPuv7JXB5t4xjQXb8WmjZjeSFw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Em seg., 10 de jul. de 2023 às 03:27, Kyotaro Horiguchi <
horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> escreveu:
> At Fri, 7 Jul 2023 11:29:16 -0700, Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im> wrote
> in
> > On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 6:12 AM Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > This has already been discussed in [1].
> > > But I thought it best to start a new thread.
> > >
> > > The commit 31966b1 introduced the infrastructure to extend
> > > buffers.
> > > But the patch mixed types with int and uint32.
> > > The correct type of the variable counter is uint32.
> > >
> > > Fix by standardizing the int type to uint32.
> > >
> > > patch attached.
> >
> > LGTM.
>
> LGTM, too.
>
Thanks Gurjeet and Kyotaro, for taking a look.
> I don't think it will actually come to play, since I believe we won't
> be expanding a relation by 16TB all at once. Nevertheless, I believe
> keeping things tidy is a good habit to stick to.
>
Yeah, mainly because of copy-and-paste.
Also, compiler has to promote int to uint32, anyway.
regards,
Ranier Vilela
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2023-07-10 11:43:44 | Re: PATCH: Using BRIN indexes for sorted output |
Previous Message | Kumar, Sachin | 2023-07-10 11:06:04 | RE: Initial Schema Sync for Logical Replication |