| From: | Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com" <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Show WAL write and fsync stats in pg_stat_io |
| Date: | 2025-03-19 12:10:00 |
| Message-ID: | CAEudQApjuqHgSyX0JGEu0pdhsWq+OQHjTZPoAhKihABmm2qcng@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Em ter., 18 de mar. de 2025 às 20:34, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
escreveu:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 04:13:15PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> > Thanks for the report! Yes, it is an oversight on my part.
>
> No worries. It's most likely me while reviewing the whole as I've
> reordered these blocks a bit while going through the patch.
>
> This has little consequences for the end user, as the read, read_bytes
> and read_time should show up as 0 instead of NULL in the pg_stat_io
> view for the two WAL rows. Still it is confusing to show zeros, and
> it makes queries of pg_stat_io a bit cheaper. Will fix in a bit.
>
Thank you Michael.
best regards,
Ranier Vilela
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2025-03-19 12:27:31 | Re: Snapshot related assert failure on skink |
| Previous Message | Christoph Berg | 2025-03-19 12:02:54 | Re: query_id: jumble names of temp tables for better pg_stat_statement UX |