Em dom., 23 de jun. de 2024 às 21:24, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
escreveu:
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 09:08:47PM -0300, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> > Doesn’t “sizeof” solve the problem? It take in account the
> null-termination
> > character.
>
> The size of BackupState->name is fixed with MAXPGPATH + 1, so it would
> be a better practice to use strlcpy() with sizeof(name) anyway?
>
It's not critical code, so I think it's ok to use strlen, even because the
result of strlen will already be available using modern compilers.
So, I think it's ok to use memcpy with strlen + 1.
best regards,
Ranier Vilela