From: | Daniel Fredouille <daniel(dot)fredouille(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: unnest multirange, returned order |
Date: | 2023-10-13 19:33:57 |
Message-ID: | CAEpV6kUr-7aS6v-azW3eeaw7p0r-xZzk4FtcNEN8HM13Orfc9g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
sorry it took me some time to reply. Yes, the patch is perfect if this is
indeed the behavior.
cheers
Daniel
Le jeu. 5 oct. 2023 à 02:50, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> a
écrit :
> On Wed, 2023-10-04 at 20:12 -0400, Daniel Fredouille wrote:
> > unnest ( anymultirange ) → setof anyrange
> > Expands a multirange into a set of ranges. The ranges are read out in
> storage order (ascending) and therefore order cannot be relied upon.
>
> That's not true. The order is deterministic and can be relied on.
>
> How about the attached patch, which does away with the confusing
> mention of "storage order"?
>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-10-13 20:37:53 | Re: Clarify: default precision on timestamps is 6 |
Previous Message | Kirk Parker | 2023-10-13 17:24:14 | Re: Clarify: default precision on timestamps is 6 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2023-10-13 20:23:21 | Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ? |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2023-10-13 18:54:07 | Re: Questions about the new subscription parameter: password_required |