Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Brown <michael(dot)brown(at)discourse(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?
Date: 2023-10-13 20:23:21
Message-ID: 20231013202321.GA1503503@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 02:34:27PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 11:14:39AM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> Thanks. I've made a couple of small changes, but otherwise I think this
>> one is just about ready.
>
> I forgot to rename one thing. Here's a v13 with that fixed.

Committed.

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2023-10-13 20:32:13 Re: LLVM 16 (opaque pointers)
Previous Message Daniel Fredouille 2023-10-13 19:33:57 Re: unnest multirange, returned order