| From: | Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PG-General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PGDG status and policy |
| Date: | 2018-10-19 16:48:39 |
| Message-ID: | CAEfWYyyRekiY16xFjOBGDhdP_QtsP+rd71UrupHy8uX5SJCGrw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 7:34 AM Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
wrote:
> On 10/18/18 3:36 PM, Steve Crawford wrote:
> > No, the *link* exists. The package doesn't (404 errors on, for example,
> > Centos 7 x86_64 and several others).
>
> According to this:
>
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/04a8f81ad82d272d031f43c9f6f742e2fd3fcd30.camel%40gunduz.org
>
> it should be fixed now. A quick check seems to indicate it is.
>
>
It is. Thanks. (I actually checked and discovered it was fixed, downloaded
and installed on two servers by the time the message came through.)
Cheers,
Steve
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Brannen | 2018-10-19 19:57:05 | RE: pg_dump backup utility is taking more time around 24hrs to take the backup of 28GB |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2018-10-19 14:44:06 | Re: PostgreSQL 11 and security |