Re: PGDG status and policy

On 10/18/18 3:36 PM, Steve Crawford wrote:
> No, the *link* exists. The package doesn't (404 errors on, for example,
> Centos 7 x86_64 and several others).

According to this:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/04a8f81ad82d272d031f43c9f6f742e2fd3fcd30.camel%40gunduz.org

it should be fixed now. A quick check seems to indicate it is.

>
> Cheers,
> Steve
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 3:22 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
> <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> On 10/18/18 3:02 PM, Steve Crawford wrote:
> > While looking to install version 11 I discovered that the PGDG Yum
> > repository page at
> > https://www.postgresql.org/download/linux/redhat/ includes
> repository
> > RPMs for RHEL7  (x86_64 and ppc64Ie), and RHEL6 (x86_64 and i386).
> >
> > However there are no RPMs for version 6 of any derivatives (CentOS,
> > Scientific, Oracle) and the RPMs for all the RHEL derivatives are
> for
> > ppc64Ie only.
>
> My guess is the code supplying the dropdowns has not been refreshed.
> Looks like the packages do exist:
>
> https://yum.postgresql.org/repopackages.php
>
> >
> > To what extent are the missing repos simply due to packagers
> being busy
> > and which are by policy? I looked for a packaging policy and
> failed to
> > find one. Does such a thing exist?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Steve
> >
>
>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com