Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?
Date: 2015-06-01 23:22:29
Message-ID: CAEepm=2veG-CJfPJWWYfUNJQnDS49AA6Z5f1PKpqaiEEis-7AA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Also ... if we were to rename it, it should be "pg_wal" or "pg_xact".
> Please let's not add yet another term for the WAL.

+1 for pg_wal if it has to be renamed.

If pg_clog also has to be renamed, how about using your other
suggestion "pg_xact" for that? It fits alongside pg_multixact.

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2015-06-01 23:47:15 Re: nested loop semijoin estimates
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2015-06-01 22:22:53 Re: nested loop semijoin estimates