| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal? |
| Date: | 2015-06-01 23:48:04 |
| Message-ID: | 556CEF34.8010305@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/01/2015 04:22 PM, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>> Also ... if we were to rename it, it should be "pg_wal" or "pg_xact".
>> Please let's not add yet another term for the WAL.
>
> +1 for pg_wal if it has to be renamed.
>
> If pg_clog also has to be renamed, how about using your other
> suggestion "pg_xact" for that? It fits alongside pg_multixact.
Yes, or pg_commit would work too (it's the "commit log").
However, choosing a new name is the easy part.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2015-06-02 00:35:39 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.3 index page count clarification |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2015-06-01 23:47:15 | Re: nested loop semijoin estimates |