| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
| Subject: | Re: Inadequate infrastructure for NextValueExpr |
| Date: | 2017-08-17 22:47:23 |
| Message-ID: | CAEepm=19UberfCpdi5QejE7npuOUtewWdmdr+LSEqR8bXHd+cQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> [...]
> T_NamedTuplestoreScan can be produced by outfuncs.c with tagname
> NAMEDTUPLESTORESCAN but that tagname is not recognized by readfuncs.c
> [...]
>
> That revealed a defect in commit
> 18ce3a4ab22d2984f8540ab480979c851dae5338 which I think should be
> corrected with something like the attached, though I'm not sure if
> it's possible to reach it.
Adding Kevin and Andrew G. Thoughts on whether this is a defect that
should be corrected with something like
read-namedtuplestorescan.patch?
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-08-17 23:16:08 | Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-08-17 22:20:16 | Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 |