Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Marc-Olaf Jaschke <marc-olaf(dot)jaschke(at)s24(dot)com>, Postgres-Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
Date: 2016-03-23 01:18:37
Message-ID: CAEepm=15dU8Vn3VomQoCtX0Jcp0f=+zoG3sR+_cdkucLCh+G2A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I was a little worried that it was too much to hope for that all libc
>> vendors on earth would ship a strxfrm() implementation that was actually
>> consistent with strcoll(), and here we are.
>
> Indeed. To try to put some scope on the problem, I made an idiot little
> program that just generates some random UTF8 strings and sees whether
> strcoll and strxfrm sort them alike. Attached are that program, a even
> more idiot little shell script that runs it over all available UTF8
> locales, and the results on my RHEL6 box. While de_DE seems to be the
> worst-broken locale, it's far from the only one.
>
> Please try this on as many platforms as you can get hold of ...

Failed on Debian 8.2, but only for de_DE.utf8. libc 2.19-18+deb8u1. Attached.

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
debian-8.2-results.txt text/plain 13.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2016-03-23 01:20:00 Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2016-03-23 01:15:09 Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2016-03-23 01:20:00 Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
Previous Message Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2016-03-23 01:15:43 Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE