Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1
Date: 2015-05-29 22:41:01
Message-ID: CAEepm=0rkJw=Vthh1cNw+ApPeYbb8XE6N-ftvX+r_-60WfkiTg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>> Just saw what looks like a report of this issue on 9.2.
>>
>> https://github.com/wal-e/wal-e/issues/177
>
> Urk. That looks awfully similar, but I don't think any of the code
> that is affected here exists in 9.2, or that any of the fixes involved
> were back-patched to 9.2. So that might be something else altogether.

Not only that, the pg_multixact/members *directory* is reported
missing, which is a different problem entirely.

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-05-29 22:48:29 Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-05-29 22:29:46 Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Gierth 2015-05-29 22:45:21 Join Filter vs. Index Cond (performance regression 9.1->9.2+/HEAD)
Previous Message Andres Freund 2015-05-29 22:33:21 Re: [CORE] postpone next week's release