From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |
Date: | 2015-05-29 22:48:29 |
Message-ID: | 20150529224829.GC6535@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-05-30 10:41:01 +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> >> Just saw what looks like a report of this issue on 9.2.
> >>
> >> https://github.com/wal-e/wal-e/issues/177
> >
> > Urk. That looks awfully similar, but I don't think any of the code
> > that is affected here exists in 9.2, or that any of the fixes involved
> > were back-patched to 9.2. So that might be something else altogether.
>
> Not only that, the pg_multixact/members *directory* is reported
> missing, which is a different problem entirely.
I don't read that from the log, what does make you think that that's the
case. Afaics it's "just" the 0146 member file that is missing?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2015-05-29 22:55:30 | Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2015-05-29 22:41:01 | Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2015-05-29 22:55:30 | Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |
Previous Message | Andrew Gierth | 2015-05-29 22:45:21 | Join Filter vs. Index Cond (performance regression 9.1->9.2+/HEAD) |