| From: | "drum(dot)lucas(at)gmail(dot)com" <drum(dot)lucas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Berend Tober <btober(at)computer(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Function PostgreSQL 9.2 |
| Date: | 2016-05-04 21:57:18 |
| Message-ID: | CAE_gQfVnhy4EbdhpyPqGhZLSk9y5DvEVmTP04iYzTMKK0b=nDA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
>
>
>
> 1) I just may be over-sensitive to this, but after Adrian Klaver referred
> you to a ten-years old post that the above looks an awful lot similar too,
> it sure would be nice to see some attribution
> rather than claiming it as your own with "...what *I* did..."
>
I would expect a minimum of respect from the members of this list, but
seems you got none. If someone would need my help, I'd never insult him/her
like you guys are doing.
If my questions are too "child" for you, please, do not answer them. Ignore
the emails... Isn't that simple?
Talking to me like you guys are talking, is what I call "a ten-years old
post".
3) Not sure you need a separate company_seq table. Since there is a
> one-to-one relation between company and company_seqs, put the last_seq
> column in the company table.
There is no company table, my friend.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2016-05-04 22:03:11 | Re: Function PostgreSQL 9.2 |
| Previous Message | Kus | 2016-05-04 21:52:43 | Re: Thoughts on "Love Your Database" |