From: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: numeric_big in make check? |
Date: | 2024-02-20 15:29:51 |
Message-ID: | CAEZATCX9=Ei=jXrAPJVpjwCYKyPxCBC6ND_-nAMp8qQCdjPS7w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 15:16, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Looking at the script itself, the addition, subtraction,
> > multiplication and division tests at the top are probably pointless,
> > since I would expect those operations to be tested adequately (and
> > probably more thoroughly) by the transcendental test cases. In fact, I
> > think it would probably be OK to delete everything above line 650, and
> > just keep the bottom half of the script -- the pow(), exp(), ln() and
> > log() tests, which cover various edge cases, as well as exercising
> > basic arithmetic operations internally.
>
> I could go with that, but let's just transpose those into numeric.
>
Works for me.
Regards,
Dean
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-02-20 15:45:51 | Re: Change the bool member of the Query structure to bits |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-02-20 15:16:00 | Re: numeric_big in make check? |