| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: numeric_big in make check? |
| Date: | 2024-02-20 15:16:00 |
| Message-ID: | 181410.1708442160@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Looking at the script itself, the addition, subtraction,
> multiplication and division tests at the top are probably pointless,
> since I would expect those operations to be tested adequately (and
> probably more thoroughly) by the transcendental test cases. In fact, I
> think it would probably be OK to delete everything above line 650, and
> just keep the bottom half of the script -- the pow(), exp(), ln() and
> log() tests, which cover various edge cases, as well as exercising
> basic arithmetic operations internally.
I could go with that, but let's just transpose those into numeric.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dean Rasheed | 2024-02-20 15:29:51 | Re: numeric_big in make check? |
| Previous Message | Dean Rasheed | 2024-02-20 15:10:11 | Re: bug report: some issues about pg_15_stable(8fa4a1ac61189efffb8b851ee77e1bc87360c445) |