Re: Minor fixes for couple some comments around MERGE RETURNING

From: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Minor fixes for couple some comments around MERGE RETURNING
Date: 2024-06-04 08:39:05
Message-ID: CAEZATCUfJUE0sYWMHP-6X=_PFzZ-m4AX4V98B-yCSRzA6A-nEg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 23 May 2024 at 04:26, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 19 May 2024 at 15:20, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > I noticed that PlannedStmt.hasReturning and hasModifyingCTE have an
> > outdated comment now that MERGE supports RETURNING (per commit
> > c649fa24a)
> >
> > i.e. these two:
> >
> > > bool hasReturning; /* is it insert|update|delete RETURNING? */
> >
> > > bool hasModifyingCTE; /* has insert|update|delete in WITH? */
>
> I've pushed the fix for that.
>

Thanks for taking care of that.

I found another couple of similar comments that also needed updating,
so I've pushed a fix for them too.

Regards,
Dean

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2024-06-04 09:30:49 Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2024-06-04 07:44:09 Re: [PATCH]A minor improvement to the error-report in SimpleLruWriteAll()