Re: Minor fixes for couple some comments around MERGE RETURNING

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Minor fixes for couple some comments around MERGE RETURNING
Date: 2024-05-23 03:25:47
Message-ID: CAApHDvr3nNZvy6NJDVzm+O0G9jozWFTPYD6wEK39UxBy6p-R4A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 19 May 2024 at 15:20, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I noticed that PlannedStmt.hasReturning and hasModifyingCTE have an
> outdated comment now that MERGE supports RETURNING (per commit
> c649fa24a)
>
> i.e. these two:
>
> > bool hasReturning; /* is it insert|update|delete RETURNING? */
>
> > bool hasModifyingCTE; /* has insert|update|delete in WITH? */

I've pushed the fix for that.

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shubham Khanna 2024-05-23 03:49:03 Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns
Previous Message Andrei Lepikhov 2024-05-23 03:22:09 Re: using extended statistics to improve join estimates