From: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Policy on pulling in code from other projects? |
Date: | 2011-07-21 18:11:13 |
Message-ID: | CAEYLb_WdFoJPEcxxD5kX0XdFQ7beQP=URQRf=32b1CF8MsBamA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 21 July 2011 18:43, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> So I am looking intently on what it is going to take to get the URI patch
> done for psql [1] and was digging around the web and have a URI parser
> library. It is under the New BSD license and is strictly RFC RFC 3986 [2]
> compliant .
>
> Now I have not dug into the code but the parser is used by other projects.
> So question is:
>
> Assuming the code actually makes this patch easier, do we:
>
> A. Pull in the code into the main tree
> B. Instead have it as a requirement via configure?
>
> 1.
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1302114698.23164.17.camel@jd-desktop
>
> 2. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986
Without commenting on the practicalities of what you'd like to do,
including code from other projects in the tree is well precedented.
Off the top of my head, I can tell you that pgcrypto uses code from
various sources, while preserving the original copyright notices.
--
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-07-21 18:13:17 | Re: Policy on pulling in code from other projects? |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-07-21 18:05:54 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove O(N^2) performance issue with multiple SAVEPOINTs. |