From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Policy on pulling in code from other projects? |
Date: | 2011-07-21 17:43:06 |
Message-ID: | 4E28652A.8050208@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hey,
So I am looking intently on what it is going to take to get the URI
patch done for psql [1] and was digging around the web and have a URI
parser library. It is under the New BSD license and is strictly RFC RFC
3986 [2] compliant .
Now I have not dug into the code but the parser is used by other
projects. So question is:
Assuming the code actually makes this patch easier, do we:
A. Pull in the code into the main tree
B. Instead have it as a requirement via configure?
1.
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1302114698.23164.17.camel@jd-desktop
2. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
@cmdpromptinc - @postgresconf - 509-416-6579
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-07-21 17:58:12 | Re: fixing PQsetvalue() |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-07-21 17:30:25 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove O(N^2) performance issue with multiple SAVEPOINTs. |