| From: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Greco <David_Greco(at)harte-hanks(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Poor performance using CTE |
| Date: | 2012-11-21 15:32:22 |
| Message-ID: | CAEYLb_W3yc+L413=WjbLLBUzoYDhfygDVaAOCtE6WenR9rDo6A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 21 November 2012 15:21, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> And I continue to think that spelling it "OFFSET 0" is horribly obscure.
I'm not sure that it's any more obscure than the very idea of an
optimisation fence.
--
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gavin Flower | 2012-11-21 15:42:16 | Re: Poor performance using CTE |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2012-11-21 15:32:09 | Re: Poor performance using CTE |