From: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: enhanced error fields |
Date: | 2012-12-30 02:48:34 |
Message-ID: | CAEYLb_VU+NT1p4OfCP3nX-6SN5z=K+eLXpiKdrFhU9LW=PMCKw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 30 December 2012 02:01, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> I really don't think what I sketched out or something similar would
> happen. I do think it's incredibly frustrating as a user who is trying
> to develop an application which behaves correctly to be given only half
> the information.
I don't know what to say to that. Sometimes, when deciding how to
address problems like this, it's possible to arrive at slightly
surprising answers by process of elimination.
--
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-12-30 02:48:35 | Re: buffer assertion tripping under repeat pgbench load |
Previous Message | Daniel Farina | 2012-12-30 02:45:46 | Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation |