Re: enhanced error fields

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: enhanced error fields
Date: 2012-12-30 02:48:34
Message-ID: CAEYLb_VU+NT1p4OfCP3nX-6SN5z=K+eLXpiKdrFhU9LW=PMCKw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 30 December 2012 02:01, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> I really don't think what I sketched out or something similar would
> happen. I do think it's incredibly frustrating as a user who is trying
> to develop an application which behaves correctly to be given only half
> the information.

I don't know what to say to that. Sometimes, when deciding how to
address problems like this, it's possible to arrive at slightly
surprising answers by process of elimination.

--
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-12-30 02:48:35 Re: buffer assertion tripping under repeat pgbench load
Previous Message Daniel Farina 2012-12-30 02:45:46 Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation