| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: enhanced error fields |
| Date: | 2012-12-30 03:32:45 |
| Message-ID: | 20121230033245.GJ16126@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Peter Geoghegan (peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
> On 30 December 2012 02:01, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> > I really don't think what I sketched out or something similar would
> > happen. I do think it's incredibly frustrating as a user who is trying
> > to develop an application which behaves correctly to be given only half
> > the information.
>
> I don't know what to say to that. Sometimes, when deciding how to
> address problems like this, it's possible to arrive at slightly
> surprising answers by process of elimination.
Err. I intended to say "I really don't think what I sketched out, or
something similar, would be that unlikely to happen", or something along
those lines. Apologies for the confusion.
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2012-12-30 04:09:30 | Re: Documentation bug for LDAP authentication |
| Previous Message | Daniel Farina | 2012-12-30 03:16:39 | Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation |