Re: pg_dump --exclude-table-data

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump --exclude-table-data
Date: 2011-12-14 11:28:00
Message-ID: CAEYLb_UutP+dKGevL77CrCM=ZR=q6sDWHJDqznijqxLY95Auug@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Not sure that I have a lot to add here, but I am officially listed as
a reviewer, which is a responsibility that I don't want to shirk.

In my opinion, this patch is obviously useful. I don't find the
asymmetry that it will create with pg_restore to be troubling, so I'd
favour committing it as-is.

Extremely minor problem noted: There are two spaces at the start of
one sentence in your SGML doc updates.

--
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2011-12-14 11:58:59 Re: COUNT(*) and index-only scans
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2011-12-14 10:58:28 Re: Command Triggers