| From: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
| Date: | 2016-03-22 18:38:33 |
| Message-ID: | CAEYLb_UO8euqgMMjhFNBt0dPAm55K7qnuwsmHoah-J94BJR3DQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
> I don't think any alternatives that anyone has put forward yet
> constitutes compelling arguments for a major version bump.
My point is that we have to bump the major version at some point.
There isn't going to be another Hot Standby + Streaming replication
sea-change in one release.
--
Regards,
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2016-03-22 18:42:25 | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
| Previous Message | Thom Brown | 2016-03-22 18:33:50 | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |