Re: 9.6 -> 10.0

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Cc: Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
Date: 2016-03-22 18:42:50
Message-ID: 56F1922A.4040104@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 03/22/2016 11:38 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>> I don't think any alternatives that anyone has put forward yet
>> constitutes compelling arguments for a major version bump.
>
> My point is that we have to bump the major version at some point.
> There isn't going to be another Hot Standby + Streaming replication
> sea-change in one release.

I would argue that BDR or PgLogical is very much that.

--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2016-03-22 18:48:48 Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-03-22 18:42:35 Re: 9.6 -> 10.0