Re: Any undocumented catalog changes remaining for v10?

From: Neil Anderson <neil(at)postgrescompare(dot)com>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Any undocumented catalog changes remaining for v10?
Date: 2017-05-24 16:35:52
Message-ID: CAEKCySsugZU5gPgTp=EOQi5RQ-AAiMXWw6J-E-rqMzVowdmttg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>
> Feature freeze is in effect and we have a Beta release out. Major bugs or
> major usability issues are the only things that would cause any change to
> the catalogs at this point and there likely won't be many, if any, of those
> (at least not ones that necessitate catalog changes - must discoveries at
> this point end up being implementation details).
>
> David J.

That makes sense and is what I was hoping for! Thanks for the info.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2017-05-24 17:34:19 Re: Current best practice for maximum shared_buffers settings on big hardware?
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2017-05-24 16:29:27 Re: Any undocumented catalog changes remaining for v10?