| From: | Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "andreas(at)proxel(dot)se" <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: general purpose array_sort |
| Date: | 2024-10-23 14:28:05 |
| Message-ID: | CAEG8a3L7RkH1f1Npru_VZ6_2hC1wJCboVWVpjKzfrY4P_=kvxg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Sorry for the late reply.
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 4:10 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > It seems there is not much meaning to sort composite type,
> > so are you proposing we should error on that?
>
> It's hardly "general purpose" if it randomly refuses to
> sort certain types. I would say it should be able to sort
> anything that ORDER BY will handle --- and that certainly
> includes the cases shown here.
Yeah, agreed.
PFA v7 with multi-array support.
>
> regards, tom lane
--
Regards
Junwang Zhao
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v7-0001-general-purpose-array_sort.patch | application/octet-stream | 16.9 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Junwang Zhao | 2024-10-23 14:37:51 | Re: Using read_stream in index vacuum |
| Previous Message | Tender Wang | 2024-10-23 13:48:11 | Wrong result when enable_partitionwise_join is on if collation of PartitionKey and Column is different. |