| From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: improve DEBUG1 logging of parallel workers for CREATE INDEX? |
| Date: | 2025-01-08 20:48:17 |
| Message-ID: | CAECtzeX7Y2Z=mttK75LP2wPAuaPxk6NA=MKRQT6NyNibEVJ_Fw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Le mer. 8 janv. 2025 à 21:44, Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com> a écrit :
> > I think DEBUG is perfectly appropriate for this sort of message.
>
> I am curious what are the thoughts on introducing a
> CREATE INDEX VERBOSE which can provide this info?
> similar to users scripting VACUUM VERBOSE to log
> more details about the vacuum operation including parallel
> usage.
>
> I have not convinced myself this is a good idea, but maybe
> someone has an opinion. If not, we can just stick with a better
> DEBUG1 message.
>
>
Sounds better to me than relying on DEBUG messages. So, yeah, VERBOSE has
my vote.
--
Guillaume.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2025-01-08 20:50:10 | Re: Incorrect CHUNKHDRSZ in nodeAgg.c |
| Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2025-01-08 20:46:39 | Re: improve DEBUG1 logging of parallel workers for CREATE INDEX? |